From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] porting from vs. porting to Plan 9
Message-ID: <20031017202039.GU834@cassie.foobarbaz.net>
References: <oprw7au7mtrveh1e@smtp.borf.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171349130.11974-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171349130.11974-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:20:39 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7175e27a-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:17:32PM -0600, ron minnich wrote:
>
> I'd still rather work with a real plan 9 kernel. There's so much baggage
> in Linux I don't want to deal with. I would rather put my efforts into
> making plan 9 a bigger deal.

Pretty much the point of my most recent post worded better. :)

--
Christopher Nielsen
"They who can give up essential liberty for temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin