From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi-9fans@mithrandi.za.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] porting from vs. porting to Plan 9
Message-ID: <20031020070457.GA30058@mithrandi.za.net>
References: <560bf571b8195e2767f06ffc580f1fb6@vitanuova.com> <43bc6b835731c3c823fdd658cb28775e@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43bc6b835731c3c823fdd658cb28775e@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:04:57 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 74339afc-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 21:28:03 -0600, mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca wrote:
> MesaGL 5.0.1 has been sitting largely compiled in $home since June
> 15th..  It needs a driver for the software renderer and for glut,
> which I believe is the harder of the two.

How would hardware support be handled?