From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin C.Atkins To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, a@9srv.net Subject: Re: [9fans] venti ports and productization Message-Id: <20031021154451.7dcb10c8.martin@parvat.com> In-Reply-To: <2ac5be8bf0047fa964b6c7068ab24559@9srv.net> References: <2ac5be8bf0047fa964b6c7068ab24559@9srv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:44:51 +0530 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 75e60ad8-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:37:01 -0400 a@9srv.net wrote: > a few times someone (ehg?) has talked about work > being done to get venti working on other OSs, and >... Well, perhaps now is a good time to own up! (Sorry for the delay in responding, but we had to write a web-page first!) I have been working on a re-implementation of Venti - initially for Linux, but it should be easy to port the core functionality to other Unix-like platforms, and eventually to Windows (I suppose...). This is not a port of Venti, but a rewrite from scratch - I have not seen/got the Venti source, although I have read the paper, and the man pages. I'm using the same basic ideas of Venti, but also making a number of different technical tradeoffs. Some of these trade-offs still need to be validated in practice (I'm working on it! :-). Before some of you get too excited - it isn't protocol-compatible with Venti (at least, I don't think it is! That would be too much of a coincidence! (see above) :-) Our goal is to release this as a shareware-style product, hopefully this year, for a price that would be consistent with your $100/machine. I hadn't put a Mac OS X version high on the agenda - should I reconsider? :-) See http://www.parvat.com/products/eternal for more information. Martin -- Martin C. Atkins martin@parvat.com Parvat Infotech (Private) Limited http://www.parvat.com