From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Nielsen To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] venti+fossil woes Message-ID: <20031115010025.GI834@cassie.foobarbaz.net> References: <20031114234303.GE834@cassie.foobarbaz.net> <3b96dd717a3ca008e09222181bf30540@caldo.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3b96dd717a3ca008e09222181bf30540@caldo.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:00:25 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8a5dea58-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:17:38AM +0000, Charles Forsyth wrote: > i know you did that, but right. sorry. > i suppose i meant: in the code of one or both of them, > somewhere it stores a value shorter than it ought to be, > and it's only noticed when allocation moves into the given region. > how big are the various partitions? i understand what you're saying, now. the arena partitions take up the whole of both 167G discs. the arenas are (the default) 512M. fossil is on a 74G partition, and the venti index is on a 18G partititon. the arena it's trying to write to is 312 out of 670. the amount of data currently in the venti is ~155G. -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin