From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200311171810.hAHIAYl23385@augusta.math.psu.edu> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Old Pharts Reminiscing? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:45:26 MST." <2147483647.1069015526@[192.168.42.6]> From: Dan Cross Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:10:34 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8d943b28-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Lyndon Nerenberg writes: > --On November 16, 2003 10:18 PM -0500 Dan Cross wrote: > > More to the point, I'm not sure it's possible. People aren't > > interested in learning how to program elegantly > > I don't agree. The people who want to, or like to, learn will have this > interest. But most of the people getting into software these days > aren't interested in programming, engineering, or even learning for > that matter. It's all about padding your resume. We're quibbling over semantics here, but to be fair, when I said ``People aren't interested...'' I should have said, ``The majority of people aren't interested...''. There's always a small percentage of people who want to learn how to do things well, but as the number of programmers grows, that segment of the programming population becomes asymptotically small. What's more, there are people who want to learn, ``The GNU way'' or ``The BSD way'' or ``The Linux kernel way'' thinking that's the best way, and who aren't willing to put in the effort to learn anything above or beyond that. > > (try telling Theo > > Deraadt that he could program more elegantly. For that matter, try > > telling him he could do *anything* differently), > > Quit picking on Theo. I don't agree with him much of the time, either, > but unlike the other people we're discussing here, he does engage his > brain and work for what he thinks is right (just like we do). There's > no dishonour in respecting your opponent. He's one of the better examples of the problem. There's nothing wrong with standing up for what is right, but there *is* something wrong with standing up for what you *think* is right without having an open mind. Theo doesn't have an open mind. > > What's more, we're seeing a lot of > > people who confuse installed base and popularity with quality. > > Critical Thinking as a core subject through the entire education > process? Hrmph. It's a nice dream.... Indeed it is, but the trend is endemic to the computer industry, not just in academia. > > Often > > times when I tell people I use Plan 9, the first question they ask me > > is, ``why?'' > > I would have expected them to respond ``what?'' Well, that's the 1-1'th question..... - Dan C.