From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Latchesar Ionkov To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc trouble Message-ID: <20031120211412.GA21463@ionkov.net> References: <20031111001624.GA10112@ionkov.net> <20031120143356.GA20235@ionkov.net> <04a401c3af94$ebe24100$b9844051@insultant.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <04a401c3af94$ebe24100$b9844051@insultant.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:14:12 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9025271c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 07:34:24PM +0100, boyd, rounin said: > > 2. Change assembler syntax to be compatible with 8a, or make GCC to generate > > Plan9 object files directly. > > > > 3. Teach 8l (and 8a) about the additional instructions that GCC can produce > > (MMX, SSE etc.), or make GCC to not use them. > > i'd rip gcc apart and get it to generate valid input to 8a. be a bugger of > a job though. is it worth the effort? I believe that plan9 needs a C++ compiler (I know that you disagree). Lucho