From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] /sys/include/ape/errno.h
Message-ID: <20040106192401.A5956@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <20040106150347.P28128@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <E1AdrDL-000JNk-Ng@t40.swtch.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <E1AdrDL-000JNk-Ng@t40.swtch.com>; from Russ Cox on Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:25:42AM -0500
Date: Tue,  6 Jan 2004 19:24:01 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b39cb48a-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:25:42AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
>
> down that path lies madness.  use the names, that's what they're for.
> the numbers aren't supposed to matter!
>
I was looking for a standard definition, so that I could address:

	#define EPROTONOSUPPORT	37
	#define EPROTOTYPE 37

as found in /sys/include/ape/errno.h, which broke a module construct.
I wasn't suggesting that I wanted to use the numeric values instead.
I'm not sure how I want to solve the original problem, given that
Charles pointed out a similar duplication in Linux, was it?

	#define	EWOULDBLOCK	EAGAIN

or some such, from memory.

++L