From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: splite@tpurdue.edu To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Some questions Message-ID: <20040128161527.GA22790@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> References: <055b01c3e5a6$ecfe5a90$67844051@SOMA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:15:27 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: c357d576-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon Sep 24 18:40:32 EDT 2001, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > I'm afraid you'd be disappointed if you used a Depraz mouse today. > A couple of years ago we had some converted to USB only to discover > that even the cheapest modern mice are better mechanically, the > buttons are incredibly clunky and the mice were not very accurate in > positioning (I'm not talking about the mouse shape here, I still > think the Depraz has the others beat hands down). No attempt to put a modern mouse's guts in a Depraz shell? Couple of good color pictures of the red Depraz mouse in: http://www.billbuxton.com/input06.ChordKeyboards.pdf