9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Micah Stetson <micah@cnm-vra.com>
To: Jim Choate <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] ssh server?
Date: Mon,  9 Feb 2004 09:08:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040209170808.GA7253@epaphras.cnm-vra.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0402071920251.22026-100000@einstein.ssz.com>

> > Sometimes.  It depends on what you're doing and what your
> > expectations are.
>
> Duh, no kidding? At no point did I say it was the solution to all
> problems.

I didn't mean to imply that you said anything like that.
This is what you said:

> It [vt] will make your life much easier than trying to do it from a
> standard rc prompt.

I interpreted this to mean that in most cases, when
working with other systems (i.e. Unix), vt provides a
better interface than a simple rio window (which you term
a standard rc prompt).  If this is not what you meant,
feel free to enlighten me.

My "Sometimes..." statement could probably have been
better worded like this: "In certain cases, Jim may be
right about this.  But in my situation and, I think, more
generally, rio is quite often more comfortable than vt,
even for interacting with other systems." My hope was
that whomever you were advising to look into vt would
also try just using rio and decide what was better in
his/her situation.  I should probably have stated this
more clearly or not entered the conversation at all.

> You misrepresent my statement.

If I did so, it was unintentional, and I apologize.  I
also apologize to the list for the unnecessary noise.
I will try to hold my tongue in the future.

Micah



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-09 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-07 18:19 vdharani
2004-02-07 16:12 ` Jim Choate
2004-02-07 21:09   ` Micah Stetson
2004-02-08  1:21     ` Jim Choate
2004-02-08 18:59       ` Jack Johnson
2004-02-09 17:08       ` Micah Stetson [this message]
2004-02-09 17:46         ` a
2004-02-08  4:56   ` boyd, rounin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040209170808.GA7253@epaphras.cnm-vra.com \
    --to=micah@cnm-vra.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).