From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] London 9con?
Message-Id: <20040211123202.15fbb225@garlic>
In-Reply-To: <029a01c3f046$0e785550$67844051@SOMA>
References: <f412c21d70952e6561977725f7d32e1b@9netics.com>
	<09EAD3D6-5B7C-11D8-B188-000A95E29604@nas.com>
	<20040210114516.GA6157@0xfe.org>
	<4029754B.1000905@ajft.org>
	<029a01c3f046$0e785550$67844051@SOMA>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:32:02 +1000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dd22518e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 03:23:35 +0100 "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net> wrote:

>> Hmmm, 48hours in aircraft and $1800 for a round trip to London... nah, I
>> don't think so.
>
>long haul sucks, particularily in a C-130.

short haul in a herc is a hoot. I've done Melbourne->Launceston and apart
from the toilet, the sideways seating and general interior style was most
l33t. makes you wonder why the crew on 747s *dont* do a patrol with a torch to
check ducting and cable runs during flight...

-George