From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200402121303.i1CD37d27282@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] byte order problem in aan?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:33:51 +0100."
             <015d01c3f110$a7792110$67844051@SOMA>
References: <101cbeeea8fbff4c200d302862277475@terzarima.net>
 <015d01c3f110$a7792110$67844051@SOMA>
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:03:07 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dfbbf63e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> > do what aan ought to have done ...
> > pack and unpack the values using a fixed byte order.
>
> yup

probably I should not react to this (but write more clear).
anyway, as I tried to explain in a later message,
I thought it would make sense to coordinate the
'fixed byte order' with the one(s) fixing aan for sources.