From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin C.Atkins To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Thai Chicken Message-Id: <20040224101119.0136e11b.martin@parvat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:11:19 +0530 Topicbox-Message-UUID: f3341bc4-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:46:05 -0500 dbailey27@ameritech.net wrote: > Hm, I think I get this. What I never understood was why there isn't a "if the character isn't found, then look in *this* font" entry. OK, this could recurse, etc horribly (and that would have to be avoided somehow), but the advantage is that a single font could be defined with all the Unicode characters, and made the default for the other fonts. Then every font would be complete, and we wouldn't have had this discussion!!! Martin -- Martin C. Atkins martin@parvat.com Parvat Infotech Private Limited http://www.parvat.com{/,/martin}