From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 finished
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:00:18 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402281300.i1SD0Ipm044920@adat.davidashen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <124b0b2bd6fb1fcc201f7e7ff1d33d5f@juice.thebigchoice.com>
> >> When I said I tell people plan9 is finished I mean "complete" not "dead".
>
> >Do you think there is a difference between complete and dead?
>
> I prefer to think of it as stable and predictable.
> The kernel is finished modulo drivers. If fairly sure there won't suddenly be
> a new scheduler or VM or 9p2005 or a bunch of new syscalls to surprise me.
>
> I think people want to be sure in their time investment. If they see that
> someone is *still* fiddling with the kernel then if they put 6 months into
> learning the OS http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/ will still be there at
> the end of it.
>
> Personally I'd prefer to think that if I download it today I won't have to be
> downloading updates every week for the rest of my days that break all my
> efforts to date.
>
> Personally I would still use plan9 if everyone else stopped, I'm sure plenty
> of us here feel the same.
So, what is the difference between a complete and a dead?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 11:30 matt
2004-02-28 11:37 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-28 12:45 ` matt
2004-02-28 13:00 ` David Tolpin [this message]
2004-02-28 13:22 ` David Presotto
2004-02-28 13:36 ` matt
2004-02-28 13:46 ` Brantley Coile
2004-02-28 14:04 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-28 15:11 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-28 16:27 ` David Presotto
2004-02-28 13:27 ` matt
2004-02-28 13:29 ` David Tolpin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402281300.i1SD0Ipm044920@adat.davidashen.net \
--to=dvd@davidashen.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).