From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
Message-Id: <200403011012.i21ACV3l065007@adat.davidashen.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Threads: Sewing badges of honor onto a Kernel
In-Reply-To: <09df9b2e5f6c9f2e600201fc413ad12e@terzarima.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Date: Mon,  1 Mar 2004 14:12:31 +0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0687e3fe-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> >>since finalized is a state of an object after it was deleted and it
> >>is only needed to define the semantics of the language, not to
>
> ``[the programmer has] the ability to declare classes or methods as "final". [they cannot
> be overriden in a subclass].  The language guarantees that the actual method invoked on
> the object is the {finalised method} [my {}] which was written for that class...''
>
> it was that sense i meant, not object destruction.

Isn't it like bind without -c?