From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] imap4d and Outlook Message-ID: <20040301121446.D29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20040229194337.A29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za> <27b7658f4e965a8acfe73430e3f4d269@plan9.bell-labs.com> <20040301064307.B29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040301064307.B29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za>; from Lucio De Re on Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:43:08AM +0200 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:14:47 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 06831ba8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:43:08AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > > It seemed such an obvious fault, I thought someone else would have > picked on it. I'll try and find some time to dig deeper. > Curiously, the year is either 1 or 2, I have seen many 1s and very few 2s. The day of the month has little bearing on the dates applicable in the actual message, but I presume Outlook's idea of a "received" time stamp comes from some other source? ++L