From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
Message-Id: <200403012112.i21LCX5E068637@adat.davidashen.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Threads: Sewing badges of honor onto a Kernel
In-Reply-To: <20040301210719.B10993@edinburgh.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Date: Tue,  2 Mar 2004 01:12:33 +0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08a04fc8-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:43:01PM +0400, David Tolpin wrote:
> > Yes, I have Inferno installed under FreeBSD. The problem with limbo
> > for me is that it is much more 'a box in a box' than Java.
>
> But wasn't that supposed to be the aim of Java?  An identical virtual
> machine running on all systems,  such that code could be written once?
>
> At least in concept,  then inferno/limbo would seem to be "java done right".

Java is done right in concept. In reality, inferno is no more right
than Java. Unfortunately. I can do system programming and command-line
apps with Java. 

How am I supposed with Inferno on FreeBSD to do that?

David