From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200403231627.i2NGRqa26759@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme, rio workalike available in plan 9 ports
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:23:52 -0500."
             <40606498.1050200@swtch.com> 
References: <ed3bfc752c237028a2f4145e43fda2e7@9srv.net> <40606498.1050200@swtch.com> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26757.1080059272.1@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:27:52 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3ea6f7b6-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> >// ...it would be nice to have multiple architecture
> >// dependent bin/lib directories as we have in plan 9...
> >
> >see also /usr/inferno (or the like).
> >  
> >
> 
> the problem isn't that i don't know what the structure should look like.
> the problem is that i don't want to do it. ...

I see your point.