From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Micah Stetson To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] rio and acme scrolling Message-ID: <20040327235709.GE4181@epaphras.cnm-vra.com> References: <20040327050754.GA20193@epaphras.cnm-vra.com> <466a2993c3a0232a58065be590e2a716@plan9.bell-labs.com> <20040327202713.GB20944@epaphras.cnm-vra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040327202713.GB20944@epaphras.cnm-vra.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:57:09 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45201f14-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:27:13PM -0800, Micah Stetson wrote: > TCP once or twice. I'm thinking the factor five speedup > is causing a race between the 30 second keep-alive timer > and the 6-second delay before a query is sent on an > inactive connnection. When the timer wins, the connection > is torn down. Well, if that was happening, it wasn't the only problem. I just had the fileserver connection hang up without APM being involved at all (as far as I can see). I ran sleep from my hard disk and it took the appropriate amount of time. Back to puzzling, Micah