From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200406141352.i5EDqPn15571@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] any success with current plan9port on sunos5.8?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:39:17 -0400."
	<200406141339.i5EDdH603214@plg2.math.uwaterloo.ca> 
References: <200406141339.i5EDdH603214@plg2.math.uwaterloo.ca> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <15567.1087221144.1@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:52:24 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9cd5153e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> > in the same way, try (typing path from memory)
> > 
> > 	nm $PLAN9/src/libthread/fdwait.o | grep yield
> 
> What's interesting is that, on my working system, I get
> 
> [40]	|         0|       0|NOTY |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |yield
> 
> which, presumably, is *not* the way it's supposed to be (i.e.,
> I ought to be seeing "p9yield" instead).

Hmmm... is there a p9yield in the linked (e.g.acme) executable?
maybe your libthread yield is also unaffected (not renamed to p9yield)?

Axel.