From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200410011451.i91Ep1U13835@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme mail "feature"
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:42:07 +0200."
	<1c9f72654aa8dc055ee1c4b8319ea803@plan9.escet.urjc.es> 
References: <1c9f72654aa8dc055ee1c4b8319ea803@plan9.escet.urjc.es> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri,  1 Oct 2004 16:51:01 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb6a15fa-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Otherwise, placing a `read' mark in the mail should not be hard.
> Either a new header

isn't that what mail  (or Mail or so) on unix (at least solaris) does?

> or just in-memory while in upas/fs.

Getting off-thread:
would it be possible to plan9port upas/fs and acme mail?
(guess I should not ask but try, but maybe someone already has an
 idea whether there would be stumbling blocks, and if so, where)

Axel.