From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] alright, this should be interesting
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:33:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410240533.i9O5XPJ24186@augusta.math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:45:56 EDT." <08eaba278d7e19b8cf1a834e055baace@coraid.com>
Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> writes:
> Personally, I've run Cygwin and, years ago, sam, 9term, and 9wm. As
> soon as possible I installed real Plan 9. I've done similar several
> times, and I have always found the simulated environments lacking in
> some way. I'm not smart enough to know why, or I'm too lazy to give
> it a lot of thought. It just seemed different in many ways and I
> always came back to real Plan 9.
System emulation layers like plan9ports, cygwin, etc are sort of like
masturbation. Sure, it's fine when you've got nothing else going on,
but it'll never beat the real thing.
- Dan C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-24 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 17:36 andrey mirtchovski
2004-10-06 1:07 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-06 1:25 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-10-06 5:25 ` geoff
2004-10-06 7:52 ` C H Forsyth
2004-10-18 16:05 ` Leo Caves
2004-10-19 2:50 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-19 15:44 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 15:57 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-19 19:45 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-19 21:22 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 22:47 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-10-19 23:39 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 3:25 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-20 9:46 ` Steve Simon
2004-10-20 14:20 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 19:47 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:29 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-21 1:31 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-21 16:19 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-19 23:17 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 4:01 ` Tim Newsham
2004-10-20 4:19 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 4:27 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-10-20 6:23 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2004-10-20 7:36 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 11:20 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 12:36 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 13:45 ` Brantley Coile
2004-10-24 5:33 ` Dan Cross [this message]
2004-10-24 11:53 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-10-24 13:44 ` Brantley Coile
2004-10-25 11:23 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 17:06 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2004-10-22 7:12 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-22 19:02 ` Jason Gurtz
2004-10-23 1:27 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 18:40 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-20 20:16 ` Nigel Roles
2004-10-20 20:46 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-20 19:59 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2004-10-20 20:02 ` Russ Cox
2004-10-20 20:05 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2004-10-20 20:25 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-10-20 20:48 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-21 18:36 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-21 4:47 ` William Josephson
2004-10-20 20:44 ` boyd, rounin
2004-10-23 18:54 ` Dan Cross
2004-10-20 11:13 ` Dave Lukes
2004-10-20 11:09 ` Dave Lukes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410240533.i9O5XPJ24186@augusta.math.psu.edu \
--to=cross@math.psu.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).