From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:31:17 -0500
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9ports and freebsd 4.x
Message-ID: <20041214023117.GA57437@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0412072318180.6476@athena>
	<1102546544.80884.0.camel@bebop.silverbrookresearch.com>
	<20041214020223.GA57268@mero.morphisms.net>
	<ee9e417a0412131813736efb@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0412131813736efb@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 15645050-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:13:07PM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> > We could probably add a test for pre c99 compilers in u.h
> > and a corresponding definition for va_copy.  The real
> > problem is finding the time to test it.
> 
> The real problem is the C99 standard but I'm not
> going to let myself get started.

Oh, of course, but I guess we'll have to learn to
live with the demented beast.  Right now, my pet
peeve is the pthreads crud...