From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  4 Feb 2005 16:47:57 +0000
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] netpbm
Message-ID: <20050204164757.F27080@mrwint.cisco.com>
References: <d247a5c4c10977b61b46e6ec39d28847@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<8ff5bc522d87f33eb5b6dc5c159350b4@vitanuova.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <8ff5bc522d87f33eb5b6dc5c159350b4@vitanuova.com>;
	from forsyth@vitanuova.com on Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:31:30AM
	+0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 022f7b34-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:31:30AM +0000, C H Forsyth wrote:
> does anyone still use cpio or pax?  apparently

Linux distributions...  At heart the archive inside a .rpm
file is in a cpio varient,  there is even a rpm2cpio filter.