From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2005 11:19:13 +0100
From: Heiko Dudzus <heiko.dudzus@gmx.de>
To: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] allow
Message-ID: <20050207101913.GA13600@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>
References: <41F879E20001AB4E@stateless1.tiscali.cz>
	<b8f9753e0515eca9ef84c641569df7a3@proxima.alt.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b8f9753e0515eca9ef84c641569df7a3@proxima.alt.za>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0451a0ae-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Lucio De Re wrote:
> > however, is this the right way to temporarily circumvent permissions??
> I have a
>
> 	prompt: srv -APW fossil
>
> in the config file and only
>
> 	% mount -c /srv/fossil /n/fossil

[snip]

> In passing, does
>
> 	% rm /srv/fossil
>
> reverse the above fossilcons command?  And
>
> 	% rm /srv/fscons
>
> ?  I'm not sure I ought to test this.

prompt: srv -d fossil

removes the srv file.