From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Venti security in view of SHA-1 exploity
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:08:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050220180800.GB47983@mero.morphisms.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01bb01c516d5$143f6030$1f587d50@kilgore>
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 11:48:06PM +0100, boyd, rounin wrote:
> >To be more precise: 2DES doesn't buy you much over DES,
> >while 3DES would appear to.
>
> nope, there is a meet in the middle attack for 2DES and going
> to 3DES is trivial to implement.
Actually, if you look at the numbers you will see that the
meet in the middle attack makes 2DES roughly equivalent to
DES, but that that is not the case for 3DES.
-WJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-20 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 18:37 [9fans] Drawterm and security Brian L. Stuart
2005-02-19 18:48 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-02-19 21:00 ` Brian L. Stuart
2005-02-19 18:58 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-19 19:15 ` blstuart
2005-02-19 19:20 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-19 20:24 ` blstuart
2005-02-19 20:34 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-02-19 19:20 ` [9fans] Venti security in view of SHA-1 exploit Paul Lalonde
2005-02-19 19:26 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-02-19 19:35 ` Paul Lalonde
2005-02-19 20:14 ` Tim Newsham
2005-02-20 4:24 ` Karl Magdsick
2005-02-19 20:15 ` Russ Cox
2005-02-19 22:25 ` boyd, rounin
2005-02-19 22:44 ` [9fans] Venti security in view of SHA-1 exploity William Josephson
2005-02-19 22:48 ` boyd, rounin
2005-02-20 18:08 ` William Josephson [this message]
2005-02-19 23:21 ` [9fans] Venti security in view of SHA-1 exploit Bruce Ellis
2005-02-20 1:00 ` Tim Newsham
2005-02-20 3:53 ` Karl Magdsick
2005-02-19 19:52 ` [9fans] Drawterm and security Skip Tavakkolian
2005-02-19 19:11 ` blstuart
2005-02-21 11:30 ` Robert Raschke
2005-02-21 19:20 ` geoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050220180800.GB47983@mero.morphisms.net \
--to=jkw@eecs.harvard.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).