From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Intel Vanderpool VM extensions
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:24:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050311152410.K25865@mrwint.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311105956.4df7bb93.martin_ml@parvat.com>; from martin_ml@parvat.com on Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:59:56AM +0530
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:59:56AM +0530, Martin C.Atkins wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:55:05 +0000 Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com> wrote:
> >..
> > > <http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/197666.htm>.
> >..
> > Interesting... I'd not heard of this. SoI had a quick glance...
> >
> > Does this stuff make the x86 completely virtualisable without
> > jumping through the hoops that vmware / qemu have to follow?
>
> I don't know. Looks complicated, doesn't it?
I did a bit more reading around, and yup it does look like it'll
do it. However it does it my sort of creating a 'ring -1' and
having the lower rings virtualised. So... what if one want's
to virtualise 'ring -1' :-)
> However, this means that yes, Vanderpool would/should (assuming
> they've got it "right" :-) make vmware 'trivial' (like MOL
> (maconlinux) is, on the Mac), but no, it will not help qemu at all,
> since the JIT interpretation of code is central to qemu's approach.
Actually it could help qemu - given that kqemu already exists. It'd
just mean that kqemu would be able to handle rings 0/1/2 as well as
ring 3.
DF
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-11 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-09 23:20 [9fans] a simple game Federico Benavento
2005-03-09 23:37 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-03-10 0:00 ` Federico Benavento
2005-03-10 0:28 ` Adrian Tritschler
2005-03-10 0:42 ` David Leimbach
2005-03-10 1:05 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-03-10 1:21 ` David Leimbach
2005-03-10 5:37 ` Federico Benavento
2005-03-10 5:39 ` Federico Benavento
2005-03-10 6:18 ` Russ Cox
2005-03-10 6:35 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-03-10 20:11 ` [9fans] Intel Vanderpool VM extensions Wes Kussmaul
2005-03-10 22:55 ` Derek Fawcus
2005-03-11 5:29 ` Martin C.Atkins
2005-03-11 15:24 ` Derek Fawcus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050311152410.K25865@mrwint.cisco.com \
--to=dfawcus@cisco.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).