On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:57:41PM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> > Eric Van Hensbergen write for Inferno, I see that he's making
> > use of addclock0link(), which makes sense. This seems to be
> > overkill for my needs though. I'm not sure the resolution of the
> > timer on the ZT5512 blades, but mine have a minimum resolution
> > of 250ms, which means that they'd be strobed twice in their
> > timeout period.
> 
> the plan 9 addclock0link has an extra argument
> that lets you specify how many milliseconds should go by
> between calls to the function you register.
> 
> russ

Oh -- I didn't see this -- the only one I found was defined in
portfns.h as:

void	addclock0link(void (*)(void));

I must be missing something -- I don't see code for that in the
kernel either. If I'm missing something, I guess this would be
ideal rather than a kproc.

--Devon