From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue,  5 Apr 2005 23:27:27 +0100
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Best Emulator to Run Plan9 in?
Message-ID: <20050405232727.A18920@mrwint.cisco.com>
References: <4252191F.6080705@golubovsky.org>
	<ee9e417a05040422416f340e89@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a05040422416f340e89@mail.gmail.com>;
	from russcox@gmail.com on Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:45AM -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 34a06164-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:41:45AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> 
> I have been running Plan 9 in QEMU for the past 
> few days and it has worked well.  I put changes on 
> sources a few days ago that correct some problems
> with the ethernet and disk simulation.

So it was definitely a plan 9 bug,  not a QEMU bug?

I seem to recall there have been problems with the
QEMU ATA emulation,  to the extent that some versions
of NT refuse to recognise the disk.

DF