From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:07:54 -0700 From: Christopher Nielsen To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] page fault with lock held Message-ID: <20050412220754.GO58567@cassie.foobarbaz.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Topicbox-Message-UUID: 36bff6a8-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i agree with geoff here. i don't like the idea of having a separate interface; everything storage should be connected into the sd framework. i have a bit of free time, right now, and if you'd like to brainstorm off-list about how to integrate aoe into the sd machinery, i would certainly like to help. On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:33:51PM -0700, geoff@collyer.net wrote: > I'd encourage fitting aoe into the sd machinery. Admittedly I haven't > got my sdaoe.c working yet, mostly due to lack of time, but I saw > nothing that would make it difficult to fit aoe into sd. A little > unorthodox, but not difficult. -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin