From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sun,  8 May 2005 13:28:15 -0400
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: Russ Cox <russcox@gmail.com>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sleep-complexity
Message-ID: <20050508172815.GA29137@augusta.math.psu.edu>
References: <20050508140323.14c96b22.20h@r-36.net>
	<19419614421.20050508155121@mail.ru>
	<ee9e417a050508095033b53757@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a050508095033b53757@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 46940b82-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:50:58PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> > Why 'n' not defined as long?
> 
> because long and int are the same so it really doesn't matter.

That's not a terribly great assumption to make, is it?

	- Dan C.