From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  1 Sep 2005 19:34:58 +0300
From: Harri Haataja <harriha@mail.student.oulu.fi>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Xen for Windows(Was:vmware 5.0)
In-reply-to: <aa1173e3536cd1325017fbf25e11fbb2@coraid.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-id: <20050901163457.GC10857@harriha-dsl.oulu.fi>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
References: <20050831185210.1218a746@localhost.localdomain>
	<aa1173e3536cd1325017fbf25e11fbb2@coraid.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 82c3b6e8-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:21:20PM -0400, Brantley Coile wrote:
> these are good reasons and bring to mind a question.  why don't we
> define a generic microkernel that all these systems can use and not
> have to go to all the tricks of VM?

Isn't that what some of the L4 groups have been talking about?

http://l4ka.org/publications/

-- 
Nothing is free.
To acquire anything requires an expenditure of time, energy, or money.
		-- Harry Browne