From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
References: <37dce6ddf2e5cbefbf8a246e9a19664f@proxima.alt.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <37dce6ddf2e5cbefbf8a246e9a19664f@proxima.alt.za>
Subject: Re: [9fans] upas/fs -f /imap/...
Message-Id: <20051126204810.8573E111351@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:48:10 -0600
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b1dfca48-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

sorry for the long delay. it took me a while to find something that
looked authoratative enough.

	http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers

seems like the right standard. it does not define imap4 (but it does
define imap4-ssl).

ymmv.

erik

lucio@proxima.alt.za writes

| 
| > (i don't know if this qualifies as "fixing" but /etc/services didn't have 
| > an imap4 entry and the imap2 entry wasn't the port i was looking for.)
| 
| Imap4 is the same port as imap, unlike imap2.  You need to fix
| /etc/services.  What platform is that?
| 
| ++L