From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>,
	Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
References: <37dce6ddf2e5cbefbf8a246e9a19664f@proxima.alt.za>
	<20051126204810.8573E111351@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
	<43F5F3CA-1947-432B-B871-D294C86729CF@orthanc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <43F5F3CA-1947-432B-B871-D294C86729CF@orthanc.ca>
Subject: Re: [9fans] upas/fs -f /imap/...
Message-Id: <20051128013211.3FDEBDA182@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:32:11 -0600
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b22e5df2-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

uh, if you'd read the thread, you'd understand that you've made my
point for me.

-- erik

Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> writes

| 
| 
| On Nov 26, 2005, at 12:48 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
| 
| > sorry for the long delay. it took me a while to find something that
| > looked authoratative enough.
| >
| > 	http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
| >
| > seems like the right standard. it does not define imap4 (but it does
| > define imap4-ssl).
| 
| The service name is 'imap' listening on port 143.