From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>, Lyndon Nerenberg References: <37dce6ddf2e5cbefbf8a246e9a19664f@proxima.alt.za> <20051126204810.8573E111351@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> <43F5F3CA-1947-432B-B871-D294C86729CF@orthanc.ca> <20051128013211.3FDEBDA182@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [9fans] upas/fs -f /imap/... Message-Id: <20051128024139.81CADDA182@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:41:39 -0600 From: quanstro@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom) Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2ce7e4a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i didn't mean to offend. sorry. but i still think you're missing the point. i can fix the code no problem. but that doesn't benefit anybody else. the parent to my post says: lucio@proxima.alt.za: | Imap4 is the same port as imap, unlike imap2. You need to fix | /etc/services. What platform is that? which would contradict what you've just said. i happen to agree with you. besides the iana list, neither fedora core 3 nor gentoo have imap4 listed in /etc/services. - erik Lyndon Nerenberg writes | | | On Nov 27, 2005, at 5:32 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: | | > uh, if you'd read the thread, you'd understand that you've made my | > point for me. | | Smartass. Your message was phrased such that it looked like you were | still asking for confirmation. I apologize for trying to lend | assistance to an apparent request for some. | | --lyndon