From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, Bruce Ellis References: <9f3897940601201419y16e87e8asb150a96269730509@mail.gmail.com> <4e949c0a389b266a652f31e3260f294c@plan9.bell-labs.com> <775b8d190601202006m7b89b1f7o6f54e516f38ba0cf@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <775b8d190601202006m7b89b1f7o6f54e516f38ba0cf@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Maybe it is april fool's after all ... Message-Id: <20060121042657.E277C15361@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:26:57 -0600 Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: e25a65f2-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 just because you can't see the source, doesn't make it any better. the worst code i ever worked with was icem/ddn, a cad program that was a mixture of fortran, c and c++. complete with holorith data, computed-gotos, overlays, and holorith data. that was also the program, of all that i've worked on, that customers liked most. - erik Bruce Ellis writes | | it would certainly be more fun if the a significant amount of | open source wasn't open crap. | | brucee | | On 1/21/06, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: | > Excuses, excuses. I thought the mantra was "Given enough | > eyeballs all bugs are shallow"? Maybe they should augment the | > rooms full of penguins typing code with rooms full of spiders | > giving it the eight-eyeball lookover. Also, what is behind | > the eyeballs, the skills can be shallower than the bugs. | > | > --jim | >