From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:22:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060124022214.GD26367@ionkov.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:06:09PM -0500, Russ Cox said:
> It appears to match the kernel better, so the implementation
> should be simpler. (As soon as you want to talk between
It is much simpler (and probably faster), and that's a big win for FUSE:
$ cat fs/fuse/*.[ch] | wc -l
4073
$ cat 9p/*.[ch] | wc -l
7271
And v9fs doesn't even have full 9P support (all users share single attach
for example).
V9fs's big plus is that it is network ready and has some form of
authentication.
I didn't see many interesting file systems on the FUSE page. I think that
v9fs can become very popular as long as we create enough useful file servers
(and even more important, write good documentation).
Lucho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-24 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 17:06 Russ Cox
2006-01-23 17:28 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 17:44 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 18:07 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-01-23 18:13 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-23 20:31 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 20:33 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 23:28 ` Dan Cross
2006-01-23 23:53 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-24 0:07 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 19:58 ` Enache Adrian
2006-01-25 20:30 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-01-25 20:51 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:09 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-25 20:50 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:09 ` Enache Adrian
2006-01-24 0:12 ` John Barham
2006-01-25 5:29 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-25 15:38 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:31 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-26 1:16 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-25 5:30 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-25 7:46 ` Jack Johnson
2006-01-25 8:11 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-25 8:18 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-25 9:46 ` Andriy G. Tereshchenko
2006-01-25 15:45 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 17:51 ` C H Forsyth
2006-01-23 17:46 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 20:08 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 18:46 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-24 2:22 ` Latchesar Ionkov [this message]
2006-01-24 8:37 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-24 9:41 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-24 10:04 ` Charles Forsyth
[not found] <000001c620ca$f86f1570$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
2006-01-24 9:46 ` "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2006-01-24 20:10 quanstro
2006-01-24 21:37 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-01-24 23:14 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-25 0:26 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 0:25 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 1:31 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-25 1:40 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 1:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060124022214.GD26367@ionkov.net \
--to=lucho@gmx.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).