From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:58:35 +0200
From: Enache Adrian <enache@rdslink.ro>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
Message-ID: <20060125195835.GA604@cubatao>
References: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net>
	<43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov>
	<3e1162e60601231231r5e95b657x99e9070d17802734@mail.gmail.com>
	<43D53D9F.90702@lanl.gov>
	<20060123232821.GO25435@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060123232821.GO25435@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e76ecdda-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:28:21PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> > - there is no posix file locking (sorry, but people want it) although 
> > the 'only allow one open at a time' is a pretty damned good substitute
> > 
> > - no ACLs (I'm convinced that the stat and wstat could be trivially
> > 	extended to support this --- 9p2000.acl)
> > 
> > - doesn't fit linux vfs semantics too well (just a joke, son, but true
> >    too -- sometimes you have to fit a good thing onto a broken thing)
> > 
> I'm sure some crackhead somewhere has added ``doesn't do readlink or
> symlink'' to that list.

- doesn't have a rename/move operation.

Regards,
Adi