From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:42:41 +0100 From: Sascha Retzki To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] complaints about new web site Message-ID: <20060127184241.GA435@routi.local.net> References: <20060127172114.C3B8A1E8C4C@holo.morphisms.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060127172114.C3B8A1E8C4C@holo.morphisms.net> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r535 (NetBSD) Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb6cd6ca-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:21:10PM -0500, Russ Cox wrote: > It's probably a very good sign that the only actual complaints we've > gotten about the web site have been about how ugly the HTML > source is. Hopefully that's the biggest problem it has. > Yes, I am very pleased by the new design - good work. However, one thing (uriel also used to raved about): Can you explain the need for the "Additional Software"-page? It looks full of outdated, depreciated software and/or duplicating/confusing things (like the first download is (seems to be?) a link to the ISO-Image). At least the name could be renamed to "Additional Software [not included in sources or outdated]" or alike. With best regards, Sascha Retzki