9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Retzki <sretzki@gmx.de>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] complaints about new web site
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:52:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060128085244.GA442@routi.local.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060127190423.B8BB91E8C55@holo.morphisms.net>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:04:19PM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:21:10PM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> > > It's probably a very good sign that the only actual complaints we've
> > > gotten about the web site have been about how ugly the HTML
> > > source is.  Hopefully that's the biggest problem it has.
> > >
> > 
> > Yes, I am very pleased by the new design - good work.
> > 
> > However, one thing (uriel also used to raved about): Can you explain the
> > need for the "Additional Software"-page?  It looks full of outdated,
> > depreciated software and/or duplicating/confusing things (like the first
> > download is (seems to be?) a link to the ISO-Image).  At least the name
> > could be renamed to "Additional Software [not included in sources or
> > outdated]" or alike.
> 
> The details of the page may change, but I believe there should
> be a page listing the major software packages that people 
> commonly want - tex, perl, python, gcc, ...

Yeah but there are two major issues:

1.) We create two places to look for software (sources and web)

2.) It may be stuff _new_ people commonly want - I don't want GCC on
Plan 9. And those people probably don't really want GCC either.


Don't misunderstand me, I don't want to imply in any way that the
porting afforts of several people should not be honored in any way - I
am not saying that the work that has already been done, without debating
if it was good or bad work, should be deleted or alike. I am just saying
that we have a clean, good, reliable way of distributing (3rd-party)
additional software - sources. 


I mean, look at the page now. If you are a new user, where do you expect
e.g. software to play an OGG-File: Under "browse the source" (respective
reading papers, the wiki, and getting an idea that Plan9 is way
different than other OSes) or do you click on "Additional Software",
finding GCC, Python and X11?


But honestly, the situation improved with the two page updates.


Sascha
> 
> I cleaned it up a little just now.  
> 
> Russ
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-28  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27 17:21 Russ Cox
2006-01-27 17:38 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-27 18:42 ` Sascha Retzki
2006-01-27 19:04   ` Russ Cox
2006-01-28  8:52     ` Sascha Retzki [this message]
2006-01-28 14:18       ` Russ Cox
2006-01-28 18:41         ` uriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060128085244.GA442@routi.local.net \
    --to=sretzki@gmx.de \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).