From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2006 13:50:04 -0500
From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p and how can I know when a write is finished
Message-ID: <20060301185004.GA4936@ionkov.net>
References: <4405D2A2.4040505@lanl.gov>
	<3461107aee09ecf85ba989151904bbe2@cat-v.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3461107aee09ecf85ba989151904bbe2@cat-v.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08ad9a8a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:21:00PM +0100, uriel@cat-v.org said:
> Maybe the bottom of clunk(5) should clarify that close() only
> generates a Tclunk when it's the last reference to the fd is closed?

Why should clunk(5) describe how an object defined outside of 9P protocol
use Tclunk?

	Lucho