From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, uriel@cat-v.org References: <46fe7f7aef31184a11f617febc9d3c0a@cat-v.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <46fe7f7aef31184a11f617febc9d3c0a@cat-v.org> Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p and how can I know when a write is finished Message-Id: <20060302014552.0873464C50@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:45:52 -0600 Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0963a42e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 the great thing about standards is there are so many to ignore. - erik uriel@cat-v.org writes | | > Paul Lalonde wrote: | >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | >> Hash: SHA1 | >> | >> You absolutely need 8k URLS - then you can encode your data, stick it | >> in the URL, and pass it to tinyURL.com for remote storage. | > | > you know, I can't tell if you're joking. Thats' how bad it's gotten on | > the net :) | > | > ron | | I wish this was a joke: | | http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2397.html | http://www.mozilla.org/quality/networking/docs/aboutdata.html | | And trust me, this is not even one of the worst parts of the web this days. | | But that is not what I was referring to, fortunately data: urls are not | too common yet (but their popularity has been growing lately.) | | We had problems with URLs >200 bytes long or so, I don't remember the | details, they are probably in the logs of #acme as fgb and me | investigated it some weeks ago. Now that I think about it, it | certainly seems very strange how writes were split so early, I'm not | sure if we checked the exact iounit value, but it certainly seemed | strangely low to me. | | uriel