From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu,
	=?utf-8?B?TmlscyBPLiBTZWzDpXNkYWw=?= <NOS@Utel.no>
References: <ea1ce128c857e8da04bb323e6197cb8d@terzarima.net>
	<000501c641de$afc905d0$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
	<440D96CF.20105@Utel.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <440D96CF.20105@Utel.no>
Subject: Re: [9fans] structure allocation.
Message-Id: <20060308002837.21A141188D@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  7 Mar 2006 18:28:37 -0600
Cc:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0e25be02-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i've done well in ignoring them so far. ;-)

"Nils O. Selåsdal" <NOS@Utel.no> writes

|
| erik quanstrom wrote:
| > thanks to all for the information.
| >
| > i was suprised that the plan9 c compiler supports bit fields.
| Just pretend they arn't there ? :-)
| You can't set them as part of a struct initializer btw.