From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  9 Mar 2006 18:32:04 -0500
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] bge
Message-ID: <20060309233204.GC2920@augusta.math.psu.edu>
References: <682b3e41a24ef46605ea2d7c2e5582ac@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<85f1dbf5e47591c036d98e933dec64cb@cat-v.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <85f1dbf5e47591c036d98e933dec64cb@cat-v.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 109bdf4a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:45:03PM +0100, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> As russ explained, the replacement for 9load is a standard Plan 9
> kernel.  I am still thinking about what the best way design the user
> space bits that parse the plan9.ini invoque /dev/reboot. I'm happy to
> hear suggestions.

No need for suggestions, surely.  It sounds like you've got the situation
well in hand.  We'll defer to your superior knowledge and experience and
just wait for your solution.

	- Dan C.