From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
References: <6e35c0620603141409q22c071d4jeaac5ffb5c6c9e7f@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <6e35c0620603141409q22c071d4jeaac5ffb5c6c9e7f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [9fans] Great Works in Programming Languages
Message-Id: <20060315023733.1807210C69@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:37:33 -0600
Cc:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 141fbc86-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

this is $0.02^x, for some x<0.

intersting this rates "pretty great"
	Edsger W. Dijkstra. Go to statement considered harmful. 11(3):147-148, March 1968.

yet this rates "great many great"
	Donald E. Knuth. Structured programming with 'go to' statments. Communications of the ACM, 6(4):261-301, 1974.

"Jack Johnson" <knapjack@gmail.com> writes

|
| Anyone see this list before and willing to give their $0.02? (In USD, please)
|
| http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/courses/670Fall04/GreatWorksInPL.shtml
|
| -Jack