From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:07:30 -0700
From: Roman Shaposhnick <rvs@sun.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive
Message-ID: <20060426010729.GH27116@submarine>
References: <7fa0cf86edd507da209feb6fe654a63e@quanstro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7fa0cf86edd507da209feb6fe654a63e@quanstro.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 46241114-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:55:31PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> last i ran gcc on sun machines (or aix for that matter), glibc was
> not required.  admittedly this was four years ago.  have things changed?

  You're right with a propper libc (like Sun's) gcc has a better chance
  of being C99 complaint. Sorry I should've been clearer.

  As for the compiler itself: http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html

Thanks,
Roman.