From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed,  7 Jun 2006 14:55:32 -0400
From: William Josephson <jkw@eecs.harvard.edu>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
Message-ID: <20060607185532.GA27660@mero.morphisms.net>
References: <200606071058.35174.corey_s@qwest.net>
	<20060607182441.GF28313@submarine> <44871FF4.2090301@lanl.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44871FF4.2090301@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5b3824a0-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:50:28PM -0600, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> no, I don't completely agree. We need gcc for general use, period. 
> Unless we like living in a cardboard box in an alley forever.

Are you mostly concerned about support for gcc language extensions
or about support for things like C++?