From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed,  7 Jun 2006 13:17:25 -0600
From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9
Message-ID: <20060607191725.GA21483@ionkov.net>
References: <200606071058.35174.corey_s@qwest.net>
	<20060607204610.GA1330@ionkov.net>
	<20060607190755.GH28313@submarine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060607190755.GH28313@submarine>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5b531f1c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

We need support for C++ and Fortran. It will use GNU binutils.
What I am planning to do (and that's what we agreed on the Secret
Plan 9 Secret Society Society meeting :) is just migrate dhogs changes 
to the newest versions of the GNU utils.

Thanks,
	Lucho

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:07:55PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnick said:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:46:10PM -0600, Latchesar Ionkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:58:35AM -0700, Corey said:
> > > 
> > > Two questions - quite likely naive, so please be kind!
> > > 
> > > #1 - How difficult approximately would it be to port a
> > > more current release of gcc to plan9, say 4.1?
> > 
> > It's in my TODO list. It shouldn't be too difficult.
> 
>   Does it include things like g++/gfortran/etc. ? What
>   backends are you interested in supporting ? What linker
>   do you intend to use ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.