From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:08:06 -0400 From: Dan Cross To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 Message-ID: <20060607230806.GC13116@augusta.math.psu.edu> References: <12bd3e4eeac406a7b2df5a203eb80021@vitanuova.com> <200606071407.14245.corey_s@qwest.net> <20060607231633.313b478e.20h@r-36.net> <200606071539.43140.corey_s@qwest.net> <20060608005635.4a210c34.20h@r-36.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060608005635.4a210c34.20h@r-36.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e2a6592-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:56:35AM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Good evening. Why do you always put the appropriate greeting of the day in your emails? > > I have neither the morale nor the power to write even a single line of > > code for this new "integrated graphical desktop environment" on Plan 9 > > -- I merely intend to assemble the work that others are doing; I'm like > > a child clumsily playing with lego bricks. The best that I can do is > > help write the gluework to get it working together nicely. > > So why are you discussing this, when you are not going to write any source > code? Because he doesn't want to invent a new window system and programming abstractions for it, but he's interesting in using one if it already exists? Why shouldn't he discuss it? What a stupid, arrogantly elitist attitude. > That is only a propaganda position and not a technical one. Propaganda is > boring. More wisdom from the IRC crowd. What, collectively, have you people ever done? We're still waiting for Uriel's 9load replacement, if I recall correctly. - Dan C.