From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:51:01 -0700 Message-Id: <200606081651.01400.corey_s@qwest.net> From: "Corey" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200606071058.35174.corey_s@qwest.net> <200606071255.16119.corey_s@qwest.net> <20060608230831.GC1125@submarine> In-Reply-To: <20060608230831.GC1125@submarine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Topicbox-Message-UUID: 62801c5e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thursday 08 June 2006 16:08, Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > Speaking about Objective-C, why don't you consider ObjC -> C compilers like > this one: http://users.pandora.be/stes/compiler.html. For your project > is sounds like a pretty good approach, especially since it plays nice > with the underlying system (e.g. generates C code which can later be > given to our beloved KenC). > That does look promising - thank you very much for the heads-up; I don't know how I managed to have missed that gem! It seems to want byacc and flex, but it looks like I got lex and yacc on Plan 9, so there should (hopefully) be minimal fuss compiling it on Plan 9 - excellent. Kind regards, Corey