From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  9 Jun 2006 21:01:23 -0600
From: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@gmx.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] quantity vs. quality
Message-ID: <20060610030123.GA22488@ionkov.net>
References: <20060610015739.GA21966@ionkov.net>
	<59f06232334eddd74b8f1c78efe5621b@quanstro.net>
	<20060610001024.GB2291@submarine>
	<20060610023116.GB22180@ionkov.net>
	<20060610004529.GD2291@submarine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060610004529.GD2291@submarine>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 66e612b2-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 05:45:29PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnick said:
>   Now, don't get me wrong -- sometimes you have to make an extra effort
>   to at least pretend that it is solvable. Especially when you are in a
>   business of building commercial software. I can appreciate it. But lets
>   move our discussion to a practical level -- could you explain what 
>   sort of "alternative" control flow you're after when something bad
>   happens inside the library. What kind of an ideal world solution
>   would you like to see as an application developer ?

Umm, like returning an error? :)

Thanks,
	Lucho